home | art & architecture | books & cds | dance | destinations | film | opera | television | theater | archives
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
It seemed
like a bad idea: making a ballet out of
Dostoyevskys The Brothers Karamazov. The complicated and complex story does not lend
itself to the straightforward kind of narrative that succeeds best in ballet. And yet Boris Eifman has pulled it of with his
company, the Eifman Ballet of St. Petersburg. If
you like Russian intensity, The Karamazovs is worth seeing.
Eifman has reduced the sprawling
novel to its bare essentials. He uses six
principal characters: the three brothers
(Alexei, Dimitri, and Ivan), their father, a local whore, Grushenka, who is pursued by the
father and Dimitri, and Katerina Ivanovna, who is interested in both Dimitri and Ivan. The first act tells the bulk of the story; the
second act is a metaphysical statement. Eifman
has kept this ballet brief--the first act is 40 minutes long and the second act only 45.
In the first act Eifman delineates
the personalities of his main characters. The
drunken, dissolute father is reflected somewhat in his son Dimitri, who likes to have a
good time. Ivan is educated and an
intellectual; Alexei is pursuing monkhood and is the most idealistic and gentle of the
brothers. The women are equally distinctive
characters. Grushenka is clearly ready
for any man, while Katerinas interest in the two brothers makes her seem troubled
all the time. The father and Dimitri are both
interested in Grushenka which leads to conflict and the death of the father, bringing the
first act to a violent close.
As often as he deals in obvious
gesture, Eifman also likes to employ metaphor. After
each of the four men has been introduced, Eifman gradually brings the three brothers
together and then adds the father. The father
wears a garment that looks like strips of cloth forming a kind of jacket. As the father leaves, each of the brothers
becomes entangled in the strips of the garment, which comes apart into three pieces. Family is the tie that binds, and the father has
his sons in his web.
Eiifman employs large scale
movement and gesture. The corps of men and
women, who serve a variety of functions (denizens of lowlife, serfs, townspeople), tend to
dance in unison. The choreography demands
athleticism and energy from the dancers, and the company does not disappoint. Just as Russian stage acting, Stanislavsky
notwithstanding, tends towards a bold, more old fashioned style, so does Eifman present
his narrative. Grushenkas long legs are
literally used to entwine the men she seeks. The
fight between the father and Dimitri makes spectacular use of a table as springboard,
shield, platform, and wall. When the father
is found dead, Dimitri is captured and ensnared in ropes, then strung aloft for a dramatic
tableau to end the first act.
The second act plumbs the nature
of each of the three brothers, with the greatest attention being given to Ivan and Alexei. Words spoken over Wagners overture to Tannhauser express Ivans nihilistic
philosophy. Alexei is depicted freeing
prisoners in a misguided rush of compassion. At
the end, each of the brothers has turned out badly and the ballet ends on a somber note, a
strong contrast to the high drama closing the first half.
Eifman either typecasts his
dancers or plays to their specific gifts. Alexei
was danced by Igor Markov, who last appeared here as the Russian
Hamlet. His open, almost naive
face is well-suited for Alexei which he danced with the same dazed intensity he employed
as Hamlet. Katerina was danced by Elena
Kuzmina, who was given some deep squats in second position, just as she had been when
dancing the role of Catherine in Russian Hamlet. Ivan was elegantly danced by Albert Galichanin. Both Oleg Markov (as the father) and Yuri Ananyan
(as Dimitri) gave lusty performances. And
Vera Arbuzova employed her long legs to good effect as Grushenka. This is a company of fine dancers who have been
trained to express personality with passion.
A pastiche of Rachmaninoff,
Mussorgsky, Wagner, and some gypsy melodies served as the music. The selections, heard on tape, were well chosen
although there was little overall cohesiveness. The
music might well have accompanied a movie, where the music is secondary and used only to
support a particular moment, not to be part of a total composition. The set design of Slava Okunev made good use of a
single structure at the back of the stage that could be modified to suggest houses, a
prison, or some strange other-worldly place.
San Francisco, March 23, 2002 - Larry Campbell