
home
| art & architecture | books & cds | dance
| destinations | film | opera | television | theater | archives
Alternate timelines have long been a staple of science fiction and
fantasy. Their implications have been examined in classics like Ursula Le Guin's novel The
Lathe of Heaven and more recently in films like Run Lola Run and Frequency. The Butterfly Effect is
the latest of these offerings, the "butterfly" in the title referring to the
often quoted theory that the breeze caused by the movement of a butterfly's wing could
unleash a chain of events that result in a typhoon. Ashton Kutcher stars as Evan Treborn,
a young man gifted with the ability of traveling through time and obsessed with altering
past events in an increasingly desperate quest for a happy outcome.
The movie opens with a scene near the end of the story. Bearded and
disheveled, Evan breaks into a darkened office, barricades himself inside, hides under a
desk and begins writing in a notebook as outside, figures distorted by the frosted glass
of the office begin shouting and pounding at the door. He's got to try one more
time. Maybe this time he can save her.
Veteran filmgoers mentally fasten their seatbelts for a flashback and
the screenplay jumps back thirteen years, when Evan is a seven year old boy being raised
by a single mother (Melora Walters). Dad's not around because, well, it's just not safe,
and Mom's getting worried about young Evan (Logan Lerman). The picture he draws in class
about what he wants to be when he grow up shows him wielding a blade and standing over a
pile of dismembered bodies. He keeps having memory lapses, one of which has ended with him
standing in the kitchen clutching a carving knife. Is Evan going to follow in the maniacal
footsteps of his father, who only slightly coincidentally is named and referred to
throughout most of the film as "Jason"?
Engaging viewers by showing the climax first and inviting them to watch
how a character gets from point A to point X is a compelling approach when done well, and
in this film, various elements come together to make it work. Much is owed to the
performances of the two child actors who play young Evan. (In addition to Logan Lerman,
John Patrick Amedori plays Evan at 13.) The time travel elements in the film are handled
logically enough so that as the story unfolds, even the presumed "insanity" of
Evan's father begins to make sense. And, because it deals with alternate timelines, The
Butterfly Effect offers a smorgasbord of roles for actors Kutcher, Amy Smart, Eldon
Henson, and William Lee Scott, whose characters shift believably from damaged, marginal
survivors of child abuse, to self-absorbed college Greeks, to institutionalized mental
patients, to earnest young preppies.
Unfortunately, there's that chronic problem of any film dealing with
the fantastic--verisimilitude. It's as if directors and screenwriters J. Mackye Gruber and
Eric Bress paid so much attention to making the supernatural elements logical that they
neglected more mundane plot points. What is one to make, for instance, of a psychiatrist
who thinks a troubled kid would benefit from visiting a father who can only be interviewed
safely while drugged and manacled? The result is a flawed film that's interesting when
being watched, but doesn't really stand up to examination afterwards.
Still, viewers may have some lively conversations afterwards about free
will, sacrifice, nature vs. nurture, the whys and wherefores of certain alterations to the
timeline resulting in certain outcomes. This is no Lathe of Heaven, but it's not
bad story-telling, and in an era of senseless action and lobotomized scripts that rely too
heavily on special effects, even the modest food for thought offered by The Butterfly
Effect is welcome.
- Pamela Troy