I’ve Loved You So Long
(2008)
Il y a longtemps que je t’aime
Directed by Philippe Claudel
Written by Philippe Claudel
Starring: Kristin Scott Thomas, Elsa Zylberstein, Serge Hazanavicius,
Laurent Grevill, Frédéric Pierrot, Lise Ségur
Run time: 117 minutes
MPAA Rating: Not Rated
www.sonyclassics.com

French novelist and screenwriter Philippe Claudel’s
debut effort as a director is causing quite a stir in movie
circles, much of it due to a powerful performance by Kristin
Scott Thomas, who plays a woman who has just been released
from prison, and who has gone to live with her sister in the
northeastern town of Nancy, France. It’s a magnificently
contained performance that solicits our engagement through
the slightest gestures—the biting of a lip, the penetrating
hollowness of a gaze, the inhaling of a cigarette as if cancer
were a welcome guest. It’s the performance of a face
and a body stripped of the life force in the film’s
beginning, a mesmerizing portrayal of a shell of a woman whose
transformation into a more engaged version of a human being
occurs almost imperceptibly. It’s a performance of great
honesty and craftsmanship. Kristin Scott Thomas allows herself
to look awful, her hair limp and her unmade face showing the
lines of middle age, her expression devoid of life. But even
looking as bad as she does, there is something exquisite about
that face, those intelligent eyes, that aquiline nose and
wide expressive mouth, that makes us want to look at her forever.
Ms. Scott Thomas plays Juliette, a woman
who, we learn about half an hour into the film, has just spent
fifteen years in prison for the murder of her six-year-old
son. Her sister, Léa (a bit too earnestly played by
Elsa Zylberstein), has agreed to take her in to help her re-integrate
into society. Léa had no contact with Juliette during
her incarceration, a fact that we find out later has to do
with their parents’ decision to cut Juliette out of
their lives after the murder. Lea’s need to help her
sister comes from a yearning to return to a time in their
childhood when they were very close, and an ordinary human
desire to love one’s sister. Still, Lea’s feelings
toward Juliette are complicated by other influences, not just
the crime she committed, and the mystery behind it, but also
the fading of her memory of the sister she once knew. Lea’s
hesitance isn’t helped by Juliette’s insistence
on remaining distant, and her husband’s quite understandable
mistrust of a convicted child murderer living in the same
house with them and their two young daughters.
Juliette is terse, even rude, in her initial encounters with
this family that she is suddenly once again a part of. It’s
as though she can’t deal with any warmth that they extend
towards her, any desire for engagement, and she is brusque
in her rejections. She’s really a cold bitch to be around,
and our initial reaction is one of dislike; we even grow suspicious
that she may indeed be a bit off.
The way Mr. Claudel introduces Juliette
is intentionally ambiguous. There is a Hitchcockian style
to the first third of the film that actually invites a negative
interpretation of Juliette’s demeanor. But this stylistic
element slowly gives way to a more benign, naturalistic style
of filming that methodically displays the more ordinary, even
mundane, details of living—going to the park or the
swimming pool, baking with the children, going to the art
museum with one of Lea’s colleagues, Michel (a very
warm and confident Laurent Grevill). Michel’s attraction
to Juliette is one of a series of experiences that nudge her
out of her self-imposed stupor. Mr. Claudel’s decision
to film discreet incidents in a pared down style (there is
hardly a discernable arc in the plot) moves the story forward
so gradually that by the film’s final scenes, the audience
is suddenly aware that Juliette has been seduced back into
the world of the living. It’s to Mr. Claudel’s
and Ms. Scott Thomas’ credit that we barely saw it coming,
and the transformation is that much more acceptable, even
fascinating. Before our very eyes, a person has come back
from the dead. Juliette has metamorphosed into an individual,
a person who needs others, and accepts being needed by others.
Our fascination with Juliette’s rebirth
almost leads us to forget the terrible crime that she committed.
Despite our ethical selves, we start rooting for her; as she
thaws, our sympathies mount. It’s an odd feeling, to
start caring for someone who murdered her own son, and this
seems at first to be the film’s main theme—acceptance
of others, even those who at first appear different. But Mr.
Claudel decided not to leave the narrative, or the ethics
around it, loosely tied, and instead provides a neat resolution
to the mystery behind Juliette’s horrible act, which
makes her metamorphosis less extraordinary, and our acceptance
of her “new self” more comprehensible. The revelation
comes as a shock in the film’s penultimate scene, and
poses as many questions as it answers. One thing is sure,
however, and that is its power to exonerate Juliette of her
sin. And this, in turn, puts our feelings about the film into
question, even as it brings Juliette’s character to
light.
Mr. Claudel has said in interviews that it
is not Juliette’s decision to end her son’s life
that is her greatest sin. It was her decision to deny life,
especially the gift of the love of others to help her in the
face of tragedy. This certainly comes through in the film,
and is probably why audiences have found it so appealing.
But the murder mystery plot device and its surprising resolution
might seem a bit too calculating to some, if not downright
disappointing.
Beverly Berning
|