
...
home
| art & architecture | books & cds | dance
| destinations | film | opera | television | theater | archives
The Next Best
Thing (2000)
A look at John Schlesinger's filmography reveals a four decade
body of work that seems almost schizoid in its range of quality. Early on, there are Billy Liar, Darling, and Midnight Cowboy, all memorably fine films from the 60's,
particularly for the distinguished performances Schlesinger drew from his stars - Tom
Courtenay, Julie Christie, Dustin Hoffman. And even back then Schlesinger didn't shy away
from gay themes. 1971's Sunday Bloody Sunday was blessed with a literate script
by Penelope Gilliat and a superb performance by Peter Finch caught up in a bisexual
triangle with a woman and another man. (It may have been the first mainstream film to
offer a genuinely erotic kiss between two men.) There were other good Schlesinger films
over the years as well, but there were some real duds, too, like Yanks and Pacific Heights.
The Next Best Thing doesn't offer the profundity of
Schlesinger's best work, but within the context of a commercial film aimed at a wide
popular market, it isn't a dud either, offering two charismatic contemporary stars,
Madonna and Rupert Everett, in performances that make the most of a script by Tom
Ropelewski, whose past record appears to consist of B-horror and talking animals.
Madonna is Abbie, the owner of a yoga school, whose inner peace does
not extend to her love life. Her current boyfriend exits in a snit. Intimacy and
commitment are too much to ask in a relationship, he suggests, while Abbie (inexplicably)
begs him to stay.
Robert (Everett), a buff gardener, is Abbie's best friend who happens
to be gay. They cap a night of drunken partying with sex - the one and only time -
resulting in Abbie becoming pregnant. She wants the baby and Everett accepts the challenge
of being the live-in father, though each remain free to pursue their outside
relationships. It's a premise worth exploring at a moment in history when traditional
definitions of "family" and "marriage" are in flux and challenged by
the wide range of relationships and varying family structures that exist in contemporary
life. The Ozzie and Harriet model doesn't reflect reality any longer for a very large
segment of the population. And gay men and lesbians have always had to grope for their own
family structures, since there have been no role models and no rules to provide them
guidance in such matters.
The first part of The Next Best Thing plays on camp humor, some
of it working, some of it not. But the film builds the creation of this twenty-first
century family with reasonable conviction, and Schlesinger once again demonstrates his
ability to draw the best from good actors. Everett, who seems effortlessly to segue from
Shakespeare to Wilde to contemporary comedy, arguably delivers lines better than anyone on
the screen today. As Robert, he's a natural, and though the writing oversimplifies and
idealizes his role as a father, he nevertheless is genuinely engaging. Madonna, in a
different persona from the black leather and whips of her videos, offers warmth and a new
vulnerability in this performance.
Some elements of humor are gleaned from the position of their son, a
delightful performance by young Malcolm Stumpf, who is questioned by his peers, for
example, as to why mom and dad have separate bedrooms, and tentatively begins to learn
what it means to have a gay father. But the plot rushes on to inevitable conflict when
Abbie finds a man she wants to marry and the temporary balance in this alternate family is
put to the test.
The situation and the performances up to this point succeed in
eliciting the viewer's sympathy, but the writing disappoints with a descent into
melodramatic conflict that seems out of character with the people we have gotten to know.
The plotting becomes awkwardly forced, but at least retains the virtue of acknowledging
the absence of easy solutions to complex family relationships.
With the glitter of its stars, The Next Best Thing will
undoubtedly draw a wide audience and most will find it to be reasonably entertaining. To
the extent that it fosters thinking about and tolerance for non-traditional families, it
is to be commended. But the filmgoer seeking a more credible or profound exploration of
the subject matter will be disappointed. This is Schlesinger Light.
- Arthur Lazere