

...
home
| art & architecture | books & cds | dance
| destinations | film | opera | television | theater | archives
|
Is Steven Soderbergh regressing? After making a handful of the most intelligent,
playful and captivating films of the late 1990's (Schizopolis, Out of Sight and The Limey), the director
transformed himself into a somewhat less interesting craftsman specializing in social
issue pictures like Erin Brockovich and Traffic. (Not surprisingly, it was this incarnation of
Soderbergh that won the Academy Award.) Ocean's
Eleven seemed to cement his reputation as Hollywood's latest golden boy, a man who
could deliver both Oscar-winners and star-studded blockbusters. With his last movie, Full Frontal, and his latest,
Solaris, it appears he's transformed himself
once again this time into a tiresome, pretentious film student.
For all its faults, Full Frontal
at least delivered a few laughs. Solaris, based on the Stanislaw Lem novel that also
inspired the 1972 Andrei Tarkovsky film of the same name, is a humorless journey into a
philosophical void.
Upon his arrival aboard the Prometheus, Kelvin spots blood on the
bulkheads and visitors who shouldn't be there. His
friend is dead and the first crew member he encounters is gibbering and gesticulating like
Dennis Hopper in Apocalypse Now.
Still, there's nothing he can't handle until he wakes up in bed next to his
apparently living, breathing wife.
Convinced that some malevolent force on Solaris has conjured Rheya from
his memories, Kelvin locks her in an escape pod and shoots her into space. But next time he wakes up, she's back again. This time he lets her stick around, despite her own
fears and questions of her existence, and the insistence of the one sane member of the
crew (Viola Davis) that Rheya and the other visitors aren't human and must be destroyed.
Though Soderbergh clearly wants to wrestle with weighty issues of
memory, identity, mortality and loss, the script he's written for Solaris doesn't come close to being up to the
task. Pronouncements like "I'm not the
person I remember" fail to inspire deep thoughts. The
closest thing to a philosophical debate is an exchange on the order of: "Am I alive
or dead?" "I don't know."
Nor does the movie work on an emotional level. The flashbacks to the Kelvins' life on Earth are
prosaic and uninvolving. There's no
discernable chemistry between Clooney and McElhone and the director is overly reliant on
meticulously lit close-ups of his lead actress's admittedly alluring face. The scenes aboard the space station are stultifying
and claustrophobic rather than hypnotic, as is apparently intended. While the cinematography is impeccable (Soderbergh
once again lenses under the pseudonym "Peter Andrews") and the set design
convincing, the human element is sorely lacking. Jeremy
Davies gives an unfortunate performance as the jabbering crew member Snow; he's showy and
hyper without being the least bit interesting. Clooney
tries to tamp down his movie star charisma and ends up a grim, joyless presence he
looks like he'd be right at home back in the Batcave.
It's hard to believe Soderbergh had a movie this dull inside him. Solaris plays
like an arthouse movie conceived by a Star Trek
fan who read about Antonioni films in back issues of Sight and Sound. The word is that Soderbergh is burnt out after making so
many movies back-to-back and plans to take a year off to recharge his batteries. It's a good idea if only he'd thought of it
one movie sooner.
- Scott Von Doviak