
...
home
| art & architecture | books & cds | dance
| destinations | film | opera | television | theater | archives
|
||
|
||
|
||
In his day job, Mark Moskowitz makes a living producing high-profile
political spots, but his true and consuming passion is reading. Moskowitz doesnt
read to keep abreast of new diets or apprised of lives laid bare. He reads for the sheer
pleasure of it.
One singular delight is The
Stones of Summer, by Dow Mossman. Back in
1972 Moskowitz came across a New York Times Book
Review rave by critic John Seelye who extolled the 600-page tome as the book of
a generation. Moskowitz eagerly picked
up the title but set it aside after struggling through its first twenty pages. Twenty-five
years later he returns to the crumbling paperback and devours it: Hes a believer.
When Moskowitz
tries to share his good fortune with his inner circle, he is shocked to discover that the
book is out of printcopies are all but extinct. Despite
the cultural imprimatur of the Times and his
own fealty to Stones, it seems that he is alone
in his devotion. Moskowitz does a bit of online sleuthing to discover that Mossman was a
one-hit-wonder. Thus are the wheels set in motion for Stone Readera documentary about one
mans odyssey to uncover the fate of one would-be seminal novel and its Salingeresque
author.
While todays New York Times
bestseller list is often fodder for next years blockbuster (or art) film, too often
something is lost in translation. Subtexts and intentions disappear; narrative is often
supplanted by action. Stone Reader is a risky challenge, then: it assays
the intangible the love of reading. Despite its sometimes ingratiating filmmaker, a
Jeffrey Tambor/Dr. Phil manque who is pervasive throughout, the film is a riveting
literary adventure, coming as close to illustrating this love as has ever been documented
onscreen. In Moskowitzs case, his is an obsession that makes the household strain of
bibliophilia seem pedestrian.
Shot over a years time, Stones
takes Moskowitz clear across the country. He heads up to Maine to convene with John
Seelye, and then over to Iowa to confab with Iowa Workshop chair and novelist Frank
Conroy. Moskowitz redefines deep background. He takes meetings with many well-known
critics, including Leslie Fielder (author of Love
and Death in the American Novel)
and eminence grise Robert Gottlieb. Neither of them has
ever heard of Mossman. Undaunted, Moskowitz treks down to Florida to surprise John
Kashiwabara. Although he was Stones book jacket designer, he has no
memory of the project either.
As clues crystallize, Moskowitz finds that the little known publisher
Bobs Merrill (which, to its credit, published Ayn Rands Fountainhead
) took on the title, later to be bought-out by IT&T during publication. Over time, he
tracks down Mossmans original agent who fills in more gaps. Moskowitz, clearly in no
rush, discovers that Mossman did in fact graduate the Iowa Workshop and returns to locate
his advisor. All told, he traverses nine states before discovering Dow Mossman. Still
alive seventeen years later, he lives spitting distance from his alma mater. Moskowitz
discovers a low-key Mossman who hasnt written for more than a decade. Hes
recently been fired from his newspaper job. Not as a reporter, but as a delivery boy.
In truth, publication of the novel almost killed Mossman. He went
through 12 drafts, writing some 1,200 pages; he was hospitalized at nearby St. Lukes.
Despite the torment, he characterizes the publication of the novel as the highlight
of my life. Still, to this fifty-six year-old, in a sense the book never
happened. He suffers from acute anxiety
and has been a welder and a caretaker. He shares this with his literary stalker - he still
views books as sacred objects.
Many of Moskowitzs subjects speak of one-hit-wonders such as
Harper Lee (To
Kill a Mockingbird),
Margaret Mitchell (Gone
With the Wind
),
and Ralph Ellison (Invisible
Man
).
Perhaps Mossman wasnt such an exception after all. Moskowitz often digresses and
always takes the long way around, almost savoring his setbacks. As a marker of a vanishing
culture the film should not be missed.
- Jerry
Weinstein