
..
.home | art & architecture | books & cds | dance
| destinations | film | opera | television | theater | archives
..
|
|
|
|
Other Stoppard reviews at
culturevulture.net:
|
|
|
|
Jumpers is quick,
witty, highly improbable and deeply erudite. In other words, it is vintage Tom Stoppard farce. Built on metaphysical propositions, the play
may suggest that metaphysical theorems, speculations, and linguistic puzzles, all of which
here abound, can only be farcical. When asked by the National Theatres interviewer
what the play was about in essence, Stoppard said: Gosh, its not a
question thats easy to answer. He did not add the standard line, "if I
knew I would not have needed to write the play."
Stoppard is in no way standard. He did say, its about a man
trying to find the answer of how to behave morally and ethically. The current New
York audience for the plays revival might or might have reached an equal level of
command over the material, and its doubtful they or anyone for that matter followed
the intricacy of every philosophical argument. They probably responded more simply to the
view of the lead actor, Simon Russell Beale (playing Professor George Moore), that the
action centers on a man trying to write a lecture....Its also about a married
couple trying to find some value in their relationship.
Act I puts both problems onstage in uncompromising fashion. Beale holds
the boards alone, working through his lecture aloud and striking a mild anxiety in the
audience as they lose the thread of his discourse on the existence of God. Will they be
able to follow the play? His wife calls from the next room: murder,
rape, help, but fails to gain his attention. Dry marriage; zero
relationship. Then Act II crackles and sparks
as conundrums increase and a murder plot gets under way.
To get it right: George Moore is a moral philosopher at a second rate
university absorbed in a quest for moral integrity, while his slightly dotty wife Dotty
(Essie Davis), a prematurely retired musical comedy actress, tries forlornly to shake
George out of his tree of abstractions. They live in a luxury flat open to blue sky and
twinkling stars, so, early on, she sings half of the juney-moon lyrics of Fly Me To
the Moon. But neither song nor her sexy come-ons in skimpy lingerie ever lead George
to her bed. What is good, he instead cries out to the heavens; or more
immediately, to the leggy secretary taking dictation from him,What did Zeno really
mean: or, does the theory of the uncaused first cause refer to God?
Dottys comfort rather comes from the preposterous Sir Archibald
Jumper. Natty in a pin stripped, double breasted suit, a distinguished psychiatrist and
Vice-Chancellor of the university, also a lawyer and a coroner, Archie is conveniently on
hand to formulate legalistic pronouncements to save Dotty from possible prosecution for
the murder of one Professor McFee, Georges rival for a major position and now
hanging on a hook inside a closet door. So, theres a detective-mystery story to be
figured out.
Stoppard has used the genre hilariously several times as it calls for
an acute study of the links between word and fact, very much his vantage of choice. Here
he uses the form as a skeleton on which to hang sober, enduring ethical questions. It
seems one Professor McFee was mysteriously shot dead during the Moores victory
celebration of the Radical Liberals party, on which occasion they stuffed McFee into a
plastic body bag. The story the Moores tell the wooden headed investigator Bones adds up
to the hypothesis that McFee shot himself either while on a jaunt in a nearby park or
while inside the bag. But the oily-philosopher-lover-Jumper plainly excels in feats of
gymnastic logic to explain away merely apparent confusions and save Dotty from possible
prosecutiona team of acrobats execute a series of jumps and leaps across the stage
to nail the analogy of physical to mental exercises.
The absurd situation and daffy sight gags keep the audience in constant
laughter through Act II, although none of the comic bits add up to consequential action in
a logical plot. It hardly matters. The rumpled Beale in a baggy, grey cardigan is himself
a sight gag pivoting on his clumsy passivity in the real world. He manages unintentionally
to impale his pet hare Thumper with an arrow and crush his pet tortoise under foot, both
fatalities also underscoring the scripts ongoing questions about the meanings of
death, ontology, and longing for an Absolute in our (regrettably) relativist universe. Oblivious George lives from the neck up. Dotty is
not so much disturbed by the bloody corpse of the jumper McFee falling into her arms from
the closet door as by the (televised) moon landing. It will change our perspective, she
wails, dislodge us from the center of the world, and cause a nation wide collapse into
liberalism and general cultural decline. Almost predictably, televised pictures of the
event absorbing her and her unfazed lover Archie are in fact of a gyrating naked lady,
herself. At the close, Dotty in a glamorous glitter outfit does fly up to perch on a
silver half moon.
Farce is Stoppards
adopted language of mistake and misapprehension raised exponentially to the nth degree of
theatricality. Everyday linguistic metaphors explode into act, gesture, a quick double
take. The whole offers a wickedly just satire of our rather limited moral intelligence,
male and female, in a form too well mannered and funny to feel cruel. But summary here
fails to catch the spirit of the piece moving on light beams in space. Jumpers is
Stoppards second full length play initially performed to prize winning acclaim by
the National Theatre in 1980. To a degree, it anticipates Travesties:
neither play takes off from a famous historical figure, a strategy that Stoppard later favors with Arcadia
and of course the more famous Rosencrantz
and Guildenstern are Dead. So, despite the likeness of the names, Jumpers is not out to parody the
naturalist philosopher Sir Thomas Moore.
George Moore rather embodies a stereotypical image of a dithering academic unattuned to
any but symbolic realms--thus the condition of education, present and future. Beale says
he took a short course in philosophy to prepare for the role, a peak after all in
Stoppards range of experiments in dramatizing the perils of rationality and reason.
Moore at one point defines philosophy as the pursuit of multiple subjects without an
object, pretty much an analysis of both play
and role. It called all the more acutely for Beales skillful timing and superior
verbal agility. The dense speeches, many of them long arguments, came trippingly off his
tongue, along with the scripts generous lashings of spoof, pun, and repartee. They
prove, at the least, that Beale and Stoppard are well matched.
Stoppards productivity has been prodigious. He has written about
a dozen plays, twice as many radio and television plays and adaptations. He was knighted
in 1997 and made a member of the Order of Merit in 2000. To the French he is an Officier
de lOrdre des Arts et des Lettres, to Americans the winner of three Tony Awards for
Best Play and an Academy Award for Best
Screenplay for his co-authorship of the film, Shakespeare
in Love.
New York, May 2, 2004 - Nina DaVinci Nichols