
.home | art & architecture | books & cds | dance
| destinations | film | opera | television | theater
| archives
|
|
|
|
Sir Noël
Coward |
|
|
|
Three Plays: Blithe Spirit/Hay Fever/Private Lives |
|
|
...
Amongst the many events celebrating the
centenary of Noël Coward's birth, the National Theatre's new production of his most
successful play has been one of the most highly anticipated. It is the 1920's and
divorcees Elyot and Amanda are honeymooning in the same French hotel with their new
spouses, Sibyl and Victor. Inevitably they meet - they are, after all, staying in rooms
with adjoining balconies - and so begins one of the most famous high comedies ever
written. Realizing that they are made for each other, Elyot and Amanda abandon husband and
wife without a backward glance and run away to Paris - before rediscovering just why they
were unable to live together in the first place. While the play was treated remarkably
lightly by the Lord Chamberlain - who had banned or cut many of Coward's other works - its
story of charming but utterly amoral people was regarded as dangerously subversive and
offensive by many when it was first produced in 1930.
Philip Franks has
his actors play the couple with a little more humanity and a little less archness than we
are used to. However, his desire to humanize the characters does seem, at times, to work
against the play. All is fine in the first Act where his approach makes their reunion
unusually affecting as they reveal the passion for each other which lies beneath their
superficial acidity. There is much telling detail. Elyot's palpable disappointment
in his new bride is evident from the outset - as is Amanda's wistfulness at the mere
mention of her ex-husband.
In Acts II and III - after they have abandoned their spouses and run
off to hole up in Amanda's Paris atelier - things begin to go wrong. If Elyot and Amanda
actually mean much of what they say to each other then they are quite monstrous and it
becomes difficult to imagine that anybody would want to spend much time with them. There
is certainly something sympathetic - and dramatically interesting - about two people so
self-obsessed that, while clearly soul mates, they cannot manage to live together but I am
not convinced that this was Coward's prime concern.
Elyot and Amanda are always acting. They are the epitome of
"camp" - if in doubt, strike a pose. It is tempting to look for the truth
underneath all this but one must also ask, in the case of this consummately witty and
entertaining play, how much "truth" there actually is. Surely Coward's main
intent here is to employ - quite superbly - his talent to amuse? The characters are
two dimensional - Victor and Sibyl are middle class English cliches just as much as Elyot
and Amanda are quintessential habitues of the cocktail hour who speak with all the
archness of the 1920's beau monde. Certainly, camp is frequently used as a defense - as it
almost certainly was by Coward, a gay artist living in a social climate still largely
hostile to his sexuality - but it isn't always the case. It can also be used for humorous
effect and the dialogue of Private Lives is probably the finest and most
concentrated example of this ever produced. For all the conscious feyness of Anton
Lesser's Elyot, these characters are avowedly heterosexual and their camp is much more a
fashion accessory than a defense. In fact the play offers no evidence that they feel they
have anything to be defensive about.
In order for the play to work we must fall in love with Elyot and
Amanda and root for them against the appalling wronged Victor and Sibyl. If too many of
their bon mots begin to sound real then the audiences' affection starts to wear thin. If
Elyot really believes that "some women should be struck regularly - like gongs,"
then he is cruel and a bully rather than just shallow and irreverent. Franks makes
the fight which ends Act II unusually violent. Perhaps he hopes that the fact that Juliet
Stevenson is several inches taller than he co-star will somehow make up for his slapping
her and
slamming a piano lid down on her fingers. It's funny and skillful - and more impressive
than the traditional pillow fight - but still leaves a slightly bitter taste.
For all its unusual tone, Frank's production is never less than
perceptive in its attention to detail and, while other versions might elicit more
laughter, there is no shortage of wit or elegance in the performances. Lesser and
Stevenson are both highly impressive - he rather overdoes the effeminacy but both have
impeccable timing and style. Her prematurely husky tones hint at a woman to whom polite
debauchery is mother's milk. Dominic Rowan and Rebecca Saire offer excellent support.
Saire comes into her own in the third act when her relish at - albeit briefly - besting
Amanda is delicious. Rowan's Victor is superb, managing to be thunderously stolid and
utterly bemused all at the same time. He also serves the subtleties of Coward's writing
particularly well. His overuse of the word "sweet" with regard to Amanda - as if
by saying it enough times he will actually achieve the impossible and make her so -
indicates from the outset just how completely at sea he is in this marriage.
..
.- Mark Jennett
(Engagement and tour completed 10/99.)