
home | art & architecture | books & cds | dance | destinations | film | opera | television | theater | archives
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
|
Playwright Rebecca Gilman's rapid rise from the obscurity of
temporary office jobs in Chicago to international literary acclaim began when her play The Glory of Living
premiered at the Windy City's Circle Theatre in December, 1996. Winning numerous awards,
the play was subsequently staged at London's Royal Court Theatre (1999) and was nominated
for a Pulitzer Prize in 2002. Subsequent plays were produced at such prestigious venues as
Lincoln Center, the Goodman Theatre, and the Manhattan Theatre Club. Awards and grant
monies were lavished upon the prolific writer as she continued to create new works.
Her latest play, The Sweetest Swing in Baseball, first played
at the Royal Court and now is receiving its American premiere at the Magic Theatre. If the
content of the play has a connection to Ms. Gilman's own reality, it would seem that the
post-acclaim road has been a rocky one. The Sweetest Thing centers on an artist,
Dana Fielding (Barbara Pitts), a painter who has had sudden success, only to be plagued by
subsequent doubts as to whether her work is really any good, whether or not her fickle
dealer and the fickle critics and the fickle buyers will continue to endorse her ongoing
efforts.
At the opening of her new show, Dana remains in the back room of the
gallery with a serious case of the jitters. Her fears about the reception for her work are
compounded by her conviction that her boyfriend is leaving her--with her career in
ascendancy her star has outshone his. The second scene moves quickly ahead to a mental
hospital where Dana is seen with her wrists bandaged. She has attempted suicide. Her
fellow patients are Gary (Michael Ray Wisely), a homicidal stalker, and Michael (Joseph
Parks), an alcoholic computer programmer.
Dana refuses to take the drugs suggested by her therapist, fearing they
will affect her creativity. Then, when she learns that her insurance will only pay for ten
days at the hospital, she seeks a new diagnosis, feigning schizophrenia by pretending that
she suffers under the delusion that she is the baseball player Darryl Strawberry. The real
Strawberry achieved major stardom, but then rode a roller coaster of a career. He was a
perpetrator of domestic violence. He was dogged by injuries and a bout with colon cancer.
He gamely made a comeback but was pulled down by alcohol and drugs. Dana clearly finds an
alter ego in this fabled character as does, one suspects, Ms. Gilman herself.
With a series of short scenes and often clever, rapid-fire dialogue,
Gilman touches on many aspects of the artist's relationship with the rest of the
world--the way that the fun of creativity is turned into work by the demands of success,
the love-hate relationship between the public and its heroes, the resentment met by
success, the abrasive meeting of art and commerce. Gilman finds some bitter humor as she
explores these themes and she astutely avoids the predictable outcomes.
But the play and Gilman's rich font of ideas never take on the
emotional weight that would constitute a powerful statement of her themes or a fully
satisfying evening of theater. None of these characters--not even Dana--is fleshed out
fully enough to engender audience empathy. The jump from the jittery opening night to the
suicide attempt, for example, is unconvincing. Gilman tries to create sufficient
motivation by adding the perceived departure of the boyfriend, but she hasn't established
dramatically the depth of the relationship beforehand, so it doesn't provide the needed
incitement to such drastic action.
The weakness of the script doesn't find needed assistance in the
performances, perhaps due to insufficient rehearsal time. The only actor who fully
inhabits his role is Joseph Parks who finds a natural ease as Michael. The others deliver
their lines with finesse but none seems to have gotten under the skin of the characters.
This is especially problematic for the difficult, but central role of Dana. Barbara Pitts
well expresses the nervousness and insecurity of the first act, but her transformation in
the second isn't fully internalized.
January 30, 2005 - Arthur Lazere