
home
| art & architecture | books & cds | dance
| destinations | film | opera | television | theater | archives
John Cassavetes: Lifeworks
Tom Charity
|
Tom Charity |
|
"There ought to be more books about John Cassavettes",
posits author Tom Charity at the outset of his own contribution to Cassavettian
literature, John Cassavettes: Lifeworks. It's a
rather odd way to start off a "critical biography" (Charity's words),
complaining about the lack of fellow studies on a subject, but the statement does make you
wonder: Why aren't there more books on him?
Seminal auteurs such as Ford, Hitchcock and
Welles have over a dozen honorary tomes to their names -- hell, even Quentin Tarantino's
bound tributes number in the double digits. Except for a handful of works, however,
there's been precious little written about the patron saint of American independent
filmmaking.
For many people, the mere mention of the word Cassavettes is shorthand
for an entire ethos of bucking the system in search of something beyond the superficial
pleasures of Hollywood. An actor who was fed up with the Tinseltown claptrap he was being
offered, he longed to see "real stories about real people" on screen. Long
before the terms "indie" or
"Sundance" became de rigueur, the director and his repertory company of
amateurs decided to just go out and make their own personal visions manifest. Though his
films sometimes drew the ire of critics and the indifference of mainstream audiences,
Cassavettes' contributions to cinema were as revolutionary and staggering as Stravinsky's,
Ornette Coleman's and Thomas Pynchon's were to their respective mediums.
Yet
the filmmaker was adamant that his work alone speak both for itself
and for it's
creator and he insisted
that
his friends, family and collaborators honor his request after his demise. The
prospect of penning a readable biography on the man seemed a daunting exercise
indeed.
Other than noted film scholar/author Ray Carney's exhaustive work in the early '90s (he
also recently edited Faber's Cassavettes
on Cassavettes interview compendium), virtually no one attempted to tackle his
work or life outside of its peripheral influence on today's cinematic landscape.
Luckily,
Charity pored through old interviews and articles written on the filmmaker and managed to
convince many of the main players involved in John's life and work,
as well as commissioning several high-profile fans (Gary Oldman, Jim Jarmusch, Pedro
Aldomovar, John Sayles) to contribute their thoughts on the late director. Lifeworks includes both original testimonials and
culled anecdotes from the people who sweat and toiled alongside Cassavetes
in the trenches. And, in honor of the filmmaker's request, Charity devotes a great deal of
space to critical analysis on all of his
films.
The
resulting book is one part biography, one part theoretical trouble-shooting, and all parts
a labor of love tribute. Charity's coverage of Cassavettes' life is thorough, tackling
historical details and relating the
ups and downs of the director's personal life to
his professional output. Son of Greek immigrant parents, student of the American Academy
of Dramatic Arts, the temperamental actor who took part in sub-par films and TV shows to
finance his own pet projects, a devoted husband and father who placed his work above
everything else, the tireless champion of "human stories" who favored
exploration over flashy film technique -- all of Cassavettes' personas get a turn in the
biographical spotlight.
Yet,
importantly, Charity never forgets that much of the story lies
in the films themselves. His deconstructive takes on Cassavettes' work are both educated
and enlightening, emphasizing recurring motifs and filmmaking tics in a scholarly manner
yet never delving into academic
double-speak. Even the subjective, less polished prose passages seem appropriate to the
material; considering how raw and roughly passionate the auteur's work is in its attempt to capture pure
emotionalism, the author's passion for the material overriding poetics seems strangely apt
for his subject.
What
Lifeworks occasionally lacks in comprehensive
obsessiveness (see Carney's books,
it more than makes up for in enthusiasm. Charity is first and foremost a fan, a fellow
filmgoer who was transformed by Cassavettes' unpolished look at the human psyche in all
its fragile, bruised and unflappable glory. The author neither paints a saintly,
whitewashed picture nor does he revel in sordid details of the man's imperfections.
Rather, by placing much of the focus on the films, and his own love of the late
filmmaker's work, Charity's love letter pays tribute to the man behind the lens and
overcomes any jagged literary edges the book may possess. It's a great introduction to the
work of a man who literally changed the way we watch movies. In a perfect world, his name
would be invoked with the same reverence as the other denizens of the directorial
pantheon: Yes, Mr. Charity, there should be more
books on the John Cassavettes. With any luck, they will all be written with as much
passion and love as this one.
- David Fear