

...
home
| art & architecture | books & cds | dance
| destinations | film | opera | television | theater | archives
|
||
|
||
|
||
____________________________________________ |
42 Up, the latest installment in Michael Apted's long-running series of documentaries
for British television, began less as a film than a sociology thesis. In 1964, Apted
interviewed a group of seven year olds in an attempt to show the full rangeof British
society as reflected in the innocent opinions of its children. It was a demographically
loaded enterprise, with the subjects selected as much for their class backgrounds as their
charm. Every seven years since then, Apted has interviewed them again, following their
progress as they've moved from adolescence through young adulthood and now on to early
middle age.
Six episodes into the experiment, the series has shifted its emphasis
to become a sort of documentary soap opera. Those of us who've followed the series (most
Americans became aware of the films with 28 Up, the first feature length
installment) are hopelessly addicted now. We've become invested in these people's lives:
can motherhood and marriage possibly satisfy the once-cynical Suzy? Is Bruce still driven
by his commitment to social justice? And the most heartbreaking question of all: will Neil
ever overcome his mental instability and stop his homeless drifting?
Apted moves freely between recent interviews and material from the
previous episodes, letting us compare the characters to their younger selves. It's a
startling effect. Where most of us choose to forget the steep expectations we had for
ourselves at 21, these people have to see their naive dreams used as introductions to
their current compromises. Most of them have come to terms with the fact of the film -
they comment knowingly about things they've said in earlier installments, confident that
those clips will end up in this episode as well - but it's easy to see why more subjects
leave with each program. The level of self-scrutiny they face each seven years must force
painful realizations.
If the early episodes were about young people grappling with the
choices that would come to define their lives, 42 Up is about settling into those
lives. As the subjects embark on careers and begin to raise families, we see them reaching
for comfort and stability. This makes the film less gripping than it could be -
accommodation and complacency are inherently undramatic - but it's never dull. The
subjects' lives aren't up for grabs in quite the same way, but there are constant jolts
and shocks as we see how they've progressed.
The class arguments that underpinned the original undertaking are
implicit now in the courses these lives have taken. Apted chose a representative cross
section of children in 1964, from privileged children in boarding schools to orphans in
youth homes. What's astonishing to an American viewer is the fact that none of them have
moved beyond their class backgrounds - the lower class kids grew up to be cabbies and
factory workers while the scions of the ruling class went on to produce television shows
or raise children on country estates.
Seeing each child grow into a life preordained by social status is
sobering and rather sad. It speaks to a truth which Americans are ideologically reluctant
to acknowledge. If only because its foreignness allows it to come to terms with one of the
great taboo subjects in our national life, 42 Up is a tremendously valuable film.
- Gary Mairs