
...
home
| art & architecture | books & cds | dance
| destinations | film | opera | television | theater | archives
|
|
|
|
|
In Faithless, Ingmar Bergman's script remains in the
territory he staked out years ago and claimed as his own--a special corner of the Swedish
psyche that is morbidly introspective and hopelessly alienated. In the 1960's and 1970's,
Bergman created a unique body of work like none that came before, films that were almost
claustrophobically focused on interior landscapes, more often than not riddled with guilt
and overflowing with emotional anguish. Films like Persona,
Cries and Whispers, and Scenes
from a Marriage were written, acted, and directed with such artistry that fans
were more than willing to follow Bergman into his dark, painful probing; the reward was in
the insight and new levels of understanding attained.
Faithless tells the story of a beautiful actress,
Marianne (Lena Endre), who is married to a symphony conductor, Markus (Thomas
Hanzon), and leaves him for his best friend, David (Krister Henriksson), a stage director
and filmmaker. While there have often been strands of unquestionably autobiographical
content in Bergman's work, he appears here to be forcing the issue. Faithless is
skillfully and sensitively directed by Liv Ullman, with whom Bergman fathered an
out-of-wedlock daughter, though he was between marriages at the time. It is not a literal
autobiography that this team offers here, so much as an autobiography of the soul. Bergman
was the son of a Lutheran minister and had a strict upbringing; one assumes from his
worldly life as an adult that his legacy from that background was the guilt, without the
solace of faith--one aspect of faithlessness.
The story of these three glamorous characters is told as the
recollections of a character named Bergman, an old man who finds time mercilessly
condensed as he nears his end. In his memory trip he conjures up Marianne who actually
narrates the story, seen in flashbacks. It's a complicated structure, since the Marianne
who is talking--indeed, the entire scenario--comes from within the mind of Bergman the
character/Bergman the screenwriter. And it is undeniably an engrossing tale, portraying
the lives and feelings of these characters with convincing dramatic skill.
All of the performances are notable in Faithless, but Lena
Endre is extraordinary. With a natural, unforced pliancy, in both her roles of storyteller
and participant, she shows a growing understanding of the consequences of faithlessness;
as her understanding grows, her pain grows in direct proportion.
The story progresses over time and the acts of faithlessness amongst
the adults continue with ever greater degrees of selfishness and cruelty, and, in
particular, with utter disregard for the effects of their actions on Marianne and Markus'
young daughter, Isabelle. She is the only innocent amongst three adults who are so
self-involved as to turn her--nearly literally--into a sacrifice. In a stunning scene that
alludes to Persona, Marianne looks at herself in a mirror, the two angles of her
face otherwise surrounded by darkness. "What am I doing to Isabelle?" She knows exactly
what she is doing to Isabelle and she does it anyway, as faithless to her daughter as she
has been to her husband. The men are equally culpable.
Bergman the narrator walks off onto his isolated, windswept beach
speaking of alienation and loneliness.
By the end of two and a half hours of living through the history of
this triangle, for all the skill and artistry displayed, it would be understandable if all
some want to say to him is, "Oh, get a grip!" Along the way, during its
unrelenting exposition of privileged adults behaving with self-indulgent dereliction of
responsibility, sympathy for the characters becomes impossible to sustain. Yet the Bergman
character is awash in self-pity (as was his alter-ego, David) and self-pity, especially
for the older Bergman who now understands the implications of what happened long ago, is a
response that fails to command either sympathy or respect.
No catharsis is offered here; none has been earned. Perhaps that
is the precisely the oppressively bleak message Bergman wants to share.
Still, it's one helluva film.