

...
home
| art & architecture | books & cds | dance
| destinations | film | opera | television | theater | archives
|
If ever there was a critic-proof movie, Harry Potter
and the Sorcerer's Stone is it. The "Harry
Potter" books have sold an estimated fifty skadillion copies worldwide and the big
screen version of the first volume in J.K. Rowling's series has arrived accompanied by all
the marketing and merchandising wizardry Warner Bros. can conjure. The movie itself is almost beside the point - it could
be a complete piece of junk and still rake in half a billion dollars. Fortunately for Potter fans, it's not junk at all,
but rather a lavish and proficient adaptation that nevertheless falls short of the first
rank of children's fantasies.
For those wayward few who have somehow managed not to crack the pages
of a Potter adventure (a group that includes this reviewer), Harry (Daniel Radcliffe) is
an 11-year-old orphan who lives in a cupboard under the stairs in the home of his uncaring
Uncle Vernon and Aunt Petunia. Unbeknownst to
Harry, his real parents were a pair of magic practitioners struck down in their prime by
an evil wizard (his aunt and uncle are Muggles - non-magical humans). Harry only learns this after accepting an
invitation to attend Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry, a fortress-like academy
for the magically inclined. There he meets
new chums Hermione Granger (Emma Watson) and Ron Weasley (Rupert Grint), with whom he is
assigned to Gryffendor House (a sentient Sorting Hat actually makes the decision). Gryffendor's arch-rival is Slytherin House,
populated by all manner of sneering bullies and future dark lords (why Hogwarts would
bother to provide training for the evil and mischievous is a question that may be
addressed in the books, but goes unanswered here). Under
the direction of Professors Dumbledore (Richard Harris), McGonagall (Maggie Smith) and
Snape (Alan Rickman), Harry begins his journey toward full-fledged wizardry.
The first half of Harry Potter
is more episodic than plot-driven, and turns out to be the most enjoyable part of the
film. Exploring the Hogwarts castle, with its
cavernous dining hall, Escher-like staircases, living paintings and roving spirits (like
Nearly Headless Nick, played with a twinkle by John Cleese), is one of the chief pleasures
the movie has to offer. The two-and-a-half
hour running time, unusually leisurely for a family movie, allows room for charming
digressions, such as an unexpected visit from a fearsome troll, or an introductory lesson
in Quidditch, a game played with broomsticks and flying balls. For a time, it's easy for even a non-fan to see
why the Potter series has cast such a spell.
Once the "sorcerer's stone" is introduced into the story,
however, much of the fun drains out of the movie. The
CGI effects crank into overdrive, the action climaxes begin to pile up, and the sense of
wonder rapidly dissipates. A giant three-headed hellhound named Fluffy makes a startling
appearance, snarling and slobbering at our terrified heroes, but director Chris Columbus
is too busy rushing toward flashier doings to spend much time with this remarkable beast. And even we Muggles know that a life-size game of
chess is one of the oldest tricks in the book, but that doesn't stop Columbus and
screenwriter Steve Kloves from making it one of the film's major set pieces.
Naturally, kids will be immune from such qualms (though younger tots
may have difficulty sitting still for 152 minutes), and the Potter faithful are unlikely
to be disappointed, if a recent advance screening audience is any indication. Certainly, compared to recent fantasy
extravaganzas like The Mummy Returns, Harry Potter is a model of restraint and
craftsmanship. Yet it does seem ironic that
the one ingredient largely missing from the movie is the very element its main character
seeks to master. Despite all the goodies in
its bag of tricks, Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's
Stone never quite delivers the magic.
- Scott Von Doviak