
...
home
| art & architecture | books & cds | dance
| destinations | film | opera | television | theater | archives
|
||
|
Lars Von Trier could almost get a trademark on provocation by now.
He heatedly divides many film critics over his works as to whether they are substantive
social critiques or hermetically-sealed worlds of contrived manipulation. Either way, his
handling of both his filmic universes and the media attention they garner are inarguably
and self-servingly savvy. He tests his audiences to the breaking point of incredulity, and
his outrageous comments and doctrines are quickly made and often just as quickly
forgotten. In the end, all his vexing and taunting really add up to one thing - clever
marketing.
With Manderlay, his sequel to
Dogville, Von Trier has come up
with his most provocative premise yet. Suffering few aftereffects following the traumas of
Dogville, the idealistic Grace (Bryce Dallas Howard, The
Village) travels with her gangster father (Willem Dafoe, Platoon)
to the fictional Manderlay plantation in
Like Dogville, Manderlay is a socio-political allegory,
in this case a vicious attack on the American dogmatism that freedom and democracy are
worth pursuing regardless of circumstances and power relationships. Its also an
attack on the current Bush administration and the Iraq War, a reading made concrete by
photos in the end credit sequence, again like those in Dogville, scored to David
Bowies Young Americans. In addition to images of 9/11, Bushs
visage supplants those of Nixon. In an unplanned-for coincidence that Von Trier must
dearly love, one section of the movie even mirrors Hurricane Katrina. Just as the
disappearance of barrier wetlands contributed to the destruction of
Like common complaints against George W. Bush, Grace is upended at every turn by her poor planning and the
inability to predict basic human responses to her plans. She gives them too much credit
and has too much faith that freedom alone brings people character. Not that Grace does not
have her successes as well. At first, freedom for the slaves means the freedom to neglect
responsibilities, and Grace must do some organized corralling. As events progress however,
an Animal Farm-like absurdity emerges in their situation. Whether someone is
allowed to laugh and the time on a clock are put to a vote. Her own rules turn into a
capital punishment nightmare.
Manderlay is every bit as ambitious as Dogville, but it
lacks Dogvilles effortless execution. Manderlay mirrors it
stylistically with its wall-less sets, but what was original before now looks like a pale
copy. The tone is turned up a notch. The wry narration by John Hurt, reprising his
function from Dogville, is even more sarcastic this time out. Von Trier seems
openly contemptuous of Grace and has turned her into a blatant caricature. Manderlay
is more didactic. In Grace vs. Daddy, we have the New vs. the Old Testament and freedom
vs. fascism, and at one point, this takes the form of a literal, dry sociological debate.
Whereas Dogville was a meticulous exploration of human ego,
selfishness, and the willingness to exploit others, Manderlays characters
feel more like puppets being pulled by Von Triers strings. This is not due to the
actors themselves who struggle mightily to bring some sense of humanity to their roles.
Some succeed (Suzette Llewellyn, Ginny Holder) and some dont (Howard, Isaach De
Bankole). As Grace, Howard is certainly willing to take risks and put herself in
vulnerable situations, the mark of dedication in any true actor. On the other hand, she
lacks the older Kidmans more mature presence, which held a strength becoming to a
kingpins daughter. Howards Grace is whinier and more childlike. (Kidman was 35
when she made Dogville, Howard is now 24.) It doesnt help that Grace has
become a self-righteous stereotype of liberal do-goodism. The only thing recognizably
human in her now are her sexual urges.
For all of Von Triers facetiousness and bravado, there is no
doubt about his filmic talent and his nerve. How meaningful his treatises are and how
palatably he presents them are debatable. With Manderlay, he has imbued the
material with enough dramatic power and relevance that despite its many flaws, it is still
essential viewing.
- George
Wu