
...
home
| art & architecture | books & cds | dance
| destinations | film | opera | television | theater | archives
|
Italian Cinema:
From Neorealism to the Present |
|
.. |
As his own filmmaking curdles into empty virtuosity - Bringing Out the
Dead, The Age of Innocence and Casino are all as dazzling as they are completely
unnecessary - Martin Scorsese has positioned himself as the cinema's official goodwill
ambassador. He's been instrumental in the restoration and re-release of such classic films
as The Golden Coach and Purple Noon. Long out-of-print critical works by James Agee and Vachel Lindsay have been republished under his imprimatur.
And if you tune into any documentary about cinema, you'll see him interviewed: garrulous,
intense, crisply professorial in his sleek Armani suits, preaching the gospel of the
movies.
Scorsese's new documentary, My Voyage to Italy, is a
passionately idiosyncratic history of the Italian cinema, framed by stories about his
immigrant family. Four hours long and comprised mainly of film clips and voice-over
narration, it may seem like something only the most hardcore of movie geeks could love.
Yet it's among the best films of Scorsese's career, a welcome return to form that gives
unexpected hope for his upcoming fiction film, Gangs of New York.
This is not an encyclopedic tour of a national cinema. Rather than
include a minute or two from a hundred films, Scorsese instead talks through substantial
portions of about a dozen major works. These sequences are edited for time but never feel
truncated. (Editor Thelma Schoonmaker uses wipes to distinguish between the cuts made for
the documentary and those in the original material.) The unique rhythms of the original
sequences are respected, so that even when La Dolce Vita is cut to its highlights, it still maintains the
turgid pacing of Fellini's original.
The film follows the careers of the great neo-realist directors from
the eruption of the movement at the end of World War II through their growth away from
grim naturalism into opulent period drama and surrealist fantasy. Key later figures - Pier
Paolo Pasolini, Bernardo Bertolucci and the Taviani brothers most prominently - are
missing from the film, and a number of the Italian cinema's greatest achievements (Nights of Cabiria,The Leopard, The
Conformist) are mentioned only in passing or neglected altogether.
This narrow focus comes not just because the neo-realists comprise
Italy's most important contribution to the cinema, but also because Scorsese saw these
films on television when growing up in a Sicilian neighborhood in Queens, New York. These
works announced themselves as completely different from the Westerns and musicals this
movie-mad six year old was used to. In one of the film's most illuminating sequences, he
butts a Roy Rogers western up against Roberto Rossellini's Paisan. The contrast is startling, and gives us a
sense of what these films must have looked like in the late '40's. The Rogers is all
primary colors, stirring music and the sort of broadly heroic storytelling young boys
devour. The Rossellini is something else entirely: stark black and white, no music at all,
languid rhythms, non-professional actors and a brutal story that edges forward
incrementally rather than leaping from event to event.
At its best, My Voyage to Italy manages enormous complexity
within a very simple structure. As Scorsese works through passages from Rome: Open
City or Umberto D, he ties the films to his family's history
and makes clear how being touched by these films spurred him to make his own. He shares
his awakening to the possibilities of the medium. His utter absorption in these
films - he clearly knows this work intimately, and is as erudite as he is passionate about
it - points inescapably to his own films. Sometimes the connections are obvious: Mean Streets, for instance, is a reworking of Fellini's I Vitelloni. The most exciting passages, however,
point far beyond such easy correspondences. Scorsese's examination of Rossellini
demonstrates that the ambivalent spirituality and drive for transcendence in his own
movies has roots not just in his life but in the art he prizes; once it is understood what
Scorsese sees in these films, the formal strategies he borrows from them gain weight
beyond simple homage.
The early neo-realist work is most often shown in spliced, scratchy16mm
dupes, the blacks and whites washed out with time to a murky gray. (The videos are worse:
the same terrible prints transferred too brightly to read the subtitles.) Here, the prints
are lovingly restored, and it's finally possible to see just how beautifully photographed
these films were.In their austerity and the clarity of their vision, they evoke the work
of great documentary photographers like Walker Evans and Robert Frank. They create a rich, offhand sense of life
unfolding before the camera, as though the events are being captured rather than being
staged for our benefit.
In the final sequence, Scorsese describes Fellini's 8 1/2 as the "purest expression of love for the
cinema that I know of." This is modesty: My Voyage to Italy is a love
letter (to the movies, to Italy, to his parents, and especially to Rossellini, Visconti
and Fellini) just as passionate, reckless and beautiful.
- Gary Mairs