
...
home
| art & architecture | books & cds | dance
| destinations | film | opera | television | theater | archives
|
||
|
Dennis Potter was first and foremost a television
writer, though he also wrote screenplays (including the memorable Dreamchild).
At a time when television rarely delivered more than instantly forgettable drivel, he
brought a highly literary intelligence as well as an uncanny sense of theatrical timing to
his scripts. In the original television mini-series, The Singing Detective, he
constructed a multileveled, multi-stranded story that carried the viewer from one episode
to the next, each episode exquisitely rationing the unfolding elements of a mystery story
formulated in the mind of its deeply disturbed writer, Philip Marlowe (renamed Dan Dark in
the film), who is hospitalized with a hideously unsightly skin condition so acute as to
render his fingers contorted into useless claws.
Dark's physical malady is both cause and effect. It has left him
emotionally consumed with bitterness, anger, and paranoia, while its origin is buried in
his repressed memories of his childhood, mostly centered on his beloved, promiscuous
mother. Adding another layer to the television version, in the midst of the narrative
Potter had his characters break into lip-synched songs and dance routines, pre-World Was
II songs that express the idealized romance of pop culture, contrasted ironically with
Dark's dysfunctional realities.
Admirers of the television series will approach the new film version
with some trepidation. At a quarter the length of the original, would the film not
abbreviate and dilute the effectiveness of what seems a virtually flawless work? The
answer is yes, but, standing on its own, the film, if less compelling than the original,
is, nonetheless, persuasive and reasonably true to its source. The screenplay was written
by Potter in 1992, two years before he died; part of his intent was to protect its
integrity after the failed screen version of his Pennies
from Heaven.
Since the date in which the film is set is later than that of the
series, Potter shifted the flashback period to the 1940's and 50's, and the musical
selections have been changed accordingly. Think "How Much is That Doggie in the
Window?," "Mr. Sandman" and "Poison Ivy" as against "Peg o'
My Heart," "Dry Bones" and "After You've Gone." While the
songs from different periods will resonate differently with audiences of different ages,
the change cannot be said to significantly alter the point of the device. As well, it
provides a bit of light relief in a very dark scenario.
The film has toned down some of the harshness of the series and the
ending seems more upbeat. There was a lot of poetry in the series voiceover; there's
little in the film. The use of words in the series was spectacular; Potter's command of
the language and his deployment of puns and wordplay were memorable. There's less of that
in the film, perhaps because there's less of the luxury of time. On the other hand, sexual
situations are more frankly portrayed in the film, fully justified by the content of the
story.
The definitive performance by Michael Gambon in the series would be a
daunting consideration for any actor now assuming the lead role. Robert Downey, Jr. (Chaplin,
Bowfinger, Wonder Boys) makes a younger, sexier Dan Dark
and his own remarkable thespian skills strongly center the film without need for apology.
He subtly captures Dark's gradual acknowledgement of the repressed truths from his
childhood, which leads to emotional resolution, even as his skin begins to heal.
As Dark's therapist, Mel Gibson is refreshingly low-keyed. A first-rate
supporting cast includes Jeremy Northam as the detective's client, Robin Wright Penn as
Dark's wife, Katie Holmes as a sympathetic nurse, and Adrien Brody and Jon Polito as a
couple of amusing hoods. Direction by Keith Gordon (Waking the Dead) is assured, keeping the
various elements of the story clearly sorted out.
- Arthur Lazere